kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi
Dave Young
dyoung at redhat.com
Sun Mar 19 19:14:12 PDT 2017
On 03/17/17 at 01:32pm, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar, at 10:09:51AM, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > Matt, I think it should be fine although I think the md type checking in
> > efi_mem_desc_lookup() is causing confusion and not easy to understand..
>
> Could you make that a separate patch if you think of improvements
> there?
Duplicate the lookup function is indeed a little ugly, will do it when I
have a better idea, we can leave it as is since it works.
>
> > How about move the if chunk early like below because it seems no need
> > to sanity check the addr + size any more if the md is still RUNTIME?
>
> My original version did as you suggest, but I changed it because we
> *really* want to know if someone tries to reserve a range that spans
> regions. That would be totally unexpected and a warning about a
> potential bug/issue.
Matt, I'm fine if you prefer to capture the range checking errors.
Would you like me to post it or just you send it out?
Thanks
Dave
More information about the kexec
mailing list