[PATCH v20 04/14] arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support
Geoff Levand
geoff at infradead.org
Mon Jun 27 10:00:26 PDT 2016
Hi,
On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 17:29 +0100, James Morse wrote:
> On 27/06/16 15:39, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > @@ -163,7 +148,7 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *kimage)
> > > > > > /*
> > > > > > * New cpus may have become stuck_in_kernel after we loaded the image.
> > > > > > */
> > -> > > > BUG_ON(cpus_are_stuck_in_kernel() && (num_online_cpus() > 1));
> > +> > > > BUG_ON(cpus_are_stuck_in_kernel() || (num_online_cpus() > 1));
> >
> > > > > > reboot_code_buffer_phys = page_to_phys(kimage->control_code_page);
> > > > > > reboot_code_buffer = phys_to_virt(reboot_code_buffer_phys);
> >
>
> Yes, that's what I meant, thanks Catalin.
>
> The 'num_online_cpus() > 1' is still needed as disable_nonboot_cpus() called via
> machine_shutdown() may have failed and this is where we check. (we can't return
> an error from either path).
>
> Geoff, I assume you agree?
Yes, we should do a final check, and abort the reboot if if we have
more than a single cpu running.
-Geoff
More information about the kexec
mailing list