[RFC PATCH v2 06/11] kexec: replace call to copy_file_from_fd() with kernel version
Dave Young
dyoung at redhat.com
Sun Jan 24 22:37:12 PST 2016
Hi, Mimi
Besides of code issues, I have several thing to be understand:
What is the effect to kexec behavior with this patchset?
- without IMA enabled (kconfig or kernel cmdline) it will be same as before?
- with IMA enabled for kernel bzImage, kexec_file_load will check both ima
signature and original pe file signature, those two mechanisms are
somehow duplicated. I'm not sure if we need both for bzImage.
Do you have a simple usage documentation about how to test it?
On 01/18/16 at 10:11am, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> This patch defines kernel_read_file_from_fd(), a wrapper for the VFS
> common kernel_read_file(), and replaces the kexec copy_file_from_fd()
> calls with the kernel_read_file_from_fd() wrapper.
>
> Two new IMA policy identifiers named KEXEC_CHECK and INITRAMFS_CHECK
> are defined for measuring, appraising or auditing the kexec image
> and initramfs.
>
> Changelog v1:
> - re-order and squash the kexec patches
>
> v3: ima: measure and appraise kexec image and initramfs (squashed)
> - rename ima_read_hooks enumeration to ima_policy_id
> - use kstat file size type loff_t, not size_t
> - add union name "hooks" to fix sparse warning
>
> v2:
> - Calculate the file hash from the in memory buffer
> (suggested by Dave Young)
> - Rename ima_read_and_process_file() to ima_hash_and_process_file()
> - replace individual case statements with range:
> KEXEC_CHECK ... IMA_MAX_READ_CHECK - 1
> v1:
> - Instead of ima_read_and_process_file() allocating memory, the caller
> allocates and frees the memory.
> - Moved the kexec measurement/appraisal call to copy_file_from_fd(). The
> same call now measures and appraises both the kexec image and initramfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 2 +-
> fs/exec.c | 15 ++++++++
> include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> include/linux/ima.h | 2 +
> kernel/kexec_file.c | 72 ++++-------------------------------
> security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 9 ++++-
> security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 7 ++++
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 27 ++++++++++---
> 8 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
> index 0a378a8..e80f767 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Description:
> option: [[appraise_type=]] [permit_directio]
>
> base: func:= [BPRM_CHECK][MMAP_CHECK][FILE_CHECK][MODULE_CHECK]
> - [FIRMWARE_CHECK]
> + [FIRMWARE_CHECK] [KEXEC_CHECK] [INITRAMFS_CHECK]
> mask:= [[^]MAY_READ] [[^]MAY_WRITE] [[^]MAY_APPEND]
> [[^]MAY_EXEC]
> fsmagic:= hex value
> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
> index 211b81c..a5ae51e 100644
> --- a/fs/exec.c
> +++ b/fs/exec.c
> @@ -884,6 +884,21 @@ out:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_read_file);
>
> +int kernel_read_file_from_fd(int fd, void **buf, loff_t *size, loff_t max_size,
> + int policy_id)
Though this is only used in kexec now, it looks more a general function, move it
to general code should be fine along with kernel_read_file
> +{
> + struct fd f = fdget(fd);
> + int ret = -ENOEXEC;
-EBADF looks better?
> +
> + if (!f.file)
> + goto out;
> +
> + ret = kernel_read_file(f.file, buf, size, max_size, policy_id);
> +out:
> + fdput(f);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> ssize_t read_code(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, loff_t pos, size_t len)
> {
> ssize_t res = vfs_read(file, (void __user *)addr, len, &pos);
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 9b1468c..9642623 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -2528,6 +2528,7 @@ extern int do_pipe_flags(int *, int);
>
> extern int kernel_read(struct file *, loff_t, char *, unsigned long);
> extern int kernel_read_file(struct file *, void **, loff_t *, loff_t, int);
> +extern int kernel_read_file_from_fd(int, void **, loff_t *, loff_t, int);
> extern ssize_t kernel_write(struct file *, const char *, size_t, loff_t);
> extern ssize_t __kernel_write(struct file *, const char *, size_t, loff_t *);
> extern struct file * open_exec(const char *);
> diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h
> index ca76f60..ae91938 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ima.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ima.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> struct linux_binprm;
>
> enum ima_policy_id {
> + KEXEC_CHECK = 1,
> + INITRAMFS_CHECK,
Change to below should be better:
KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK
KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK
> IMA_MAX_READ_CHECK
> };
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index b70ada0..f7c3ce4 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/kexec.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/ima.h>
> #include <crypto/hash.h>
> #include <crypto/sha.h>
> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> @@ -33,65 +34,6 @@ size_t __weak kexec_purgatory_size = 0;
>
> static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image);
>
> -static int copy_file_from_fd(int fd, void **buf, unsigned long *buf_len)
> -{
> - struct fd f = fdget(fd);
> - int ret;
> - struct kstat stat;
> - loff_t pos;
> - ssize_t bytes = 0;
> -
> - if (!f.file)
> - return -EBADF;
> -
> - ret = vfs_getattr(&f.file->f_path, &stat);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
> -
> - if (stat.size > INT_MAX) {
> - ret = -EFBIG;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - /* Don't hand 0 to vmalloc, it whines. */
> - if (stat.size == 0) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - *buf = vmalloc(stat.size);
> - if (!*buf) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - pos = 0;
> - while (pos < stat.size) {
> - bytes = kernel_read(f.file, pos, (char *)(*buf) + pos,
> - stat.size - pos);
> - if (bytes < 0) {
> - vfree(*buf);
> - ret = bytes;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - if (bytes == 0)
> - break;
> - pos += bytes;
> - }
> -
> - if (pos != stat.size) {
> - ret = -EBADF;
> - vfree(*buf);
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - *buf_len = pos;
> -out:
> - fdput(f);
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> /* Architectures can provide this probe function */
> int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> unsigned long buf_len)
> @@ -180,16 +122,17 @@ kimage_file_prepare_segments(struct kimage *image, int kernel_fd, int initrd_fd,
> {
> int ret = 0;
> void *ldata;
> + loff_t size;
>
> - ret = copy_file_from_fd(kernel_fd, &image->kernel_buf,
> - &image->kernel_buf_len);
> + ret = kernel_read_file_from_fd(kernel_fd, &image->kernel_buf,
> + &size, INT_MAX, KEXEC_CHECK);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> + image->kernel_buf_len = size;
>
> /* Call arch image probe handlers */
> ret = arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(image, image->kernel_buf,
> image->kernel_buf_len);
> -
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> @@ -204,10 +147,11 @@ kimage_file_prepare_segments(struct kimage *image, int kernel_fd, int initrd_fd,
> #endif
> /* It is possible that there no initramfs is being loaded */
> if (!(flags & KEXEC_FILE_NO_INITRAMFS)) {
> - ret = copy_file_from_fd(initrd_fd, &image->initrd_buf,
> - &image->initrd_buf_len);
> + ret = kernel_read_file_from_fd(initrd_fd, &image->initrd_buf,
> + &size, INT_MAX, INITRAMFS_CHECK);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> + image->initrd_buf_len = size;
> }
>
> if (cmdline_len) {
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index 06bcc24..b98dbd5 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -160,7 +160,14 @@ void ima_free_template_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry);
> const char *ima_d_path(struct path *path, char **pathbuf);
>
> /* IMA policy related functions */
> -enum ima_hooks { FILE_CHECK = 1, MMAP_CHECK, BPRM_CHECK, MODULE_CHECK, FIRMWARE_CHECK, POST_SETATTR };
> +enum ima_hooks {
> + FILE_CHECK = IMA_MAX_READ_CHECK,
> + MMAP_CHECK,
> + BPRM_CHECK,
> + MODULE_CHECK,
> + FIRMWARE_CHECK,
> + POST_SETATTR
> +};
>
> int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, int func, int mask, int flags);
> void ima_init_policy(void);
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> index 4edf47f..3adf937 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ enum integrity_status ima_get_cache_status(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
> return iint->ima_module_status;
> case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
> return iint->ima_firmware_status;
> + case KEXEC_CHECK ... IMA_MAX_READ_CHECK - 1:
> + return iint->ima_read_status;
> case FILE_CHECK:
> default:
> return iint->ima_file_status;
> @@ -100,6 +102,9 @@ static void ima_set_cache_status(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
> case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
> iint->ima_firmware_status = status;
> break;
> + case KEXEC_CHECK ... IMA_MAX_READ_CHECK - 1:
> + iint->ima_read_status = status;
> + break;
> case FILE_CHECK:
> default:
> iint->ima_file_status = status;
> @@ -122,6 +127,8 @@ static void ima_cache_flags(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, int func)
> case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
> iint->flags |= (IMA_FIRMWARE_APPRAISED | IMA_APPRAISED);
> break;
> + case KEXEC_CHECK ... IMA_MAX_READ_CHECK - 1:
> + break;
> case FILE_CHECK:
> default:
> iint->flags |= (IMA_FILE_APPRAISED | IMA_APPRAISED);
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index 595e038..4711083 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, int func)
> return IMA_MODULE_APPRAISE;
> case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
> return IMA_FIRMWARE_APPRAISE;
> + case KEXEC_CHECK ... IMA_MAX_READ_CHECK - 1:
> + return IMA_READ_APPRAISE;
> case FILE_CHECK:
> default:
> return IMA_FILE_APPRAISE;
> @@ -614,6 +616,10 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
> entry->hooks.func = MMAP_CHECK;
> else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "BPRM_CHECK") == 0)
> entry->hooks.func = BPRM_CHECK;
> + else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "KEXEC_CHECK") == 0)
> + entry->hooks.policy_id = KEXEC_CHECK;
> + else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "INITRAMFS_CHECK") == 0)
> + entry->hooks.policy_id = INITRAMFS_CHECK;
> else
> result = -EINVAL;
> if (!result)
> @@ -867,7 +873,9 @@ static char *func_tokens[] = {
> "BPRM_CHECK",
> "MODULE_CHECK",
> "FIRMWARE_CHECK",
> - "POST_SETATTR"
> + "POST_SETATTR",
> + "KEXEC_CHECK",
> + "INITRAMFS_CHECK",
> };
>
> void *ima_policy_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> @@ -948,10 +956,19 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_post));
> break;
> default:
> - snprintf(tbuf, sizeof(tbuf), "%d",
> - entry->hooks.func);
> - seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), tbuf);
> - break;
> + switch (entry->hooks.policy_id) {
> + case KEXEC_CHECK:
> + seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_kexec));
> + break;
> + case INITRAMFS_CHECK:
> + seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_initramfs));
> + break;
> + default:
> + snprintf(tbuf, sizeof(tbuf), "%d",
> + entry->hooks.func);
> + seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), tbuf);
> + break;
> + }
> }
> seq_puts(m, " ");
> }
> --
> 2.1.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
More information about the kexec
mailing list