[PATCH v2] Improve the performance of --num-threads -d 31

["Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"]

Hello Minfei,

The mail I sent to you and kexec list is held by the kexec list.
Have you received it?
Should I resend?

-- 
Thanks
Zhou

On 02/24/2016 10:24 AM, Minfei Huang wrote:
>
>> On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:20, Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑 <zhouwj-fnst at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 02/24/2016 09:43 AM, Minfei Huang wrote:
>>> On 02/23/16 at 01:47pm, "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑" wrote:
>>>> Hello, Minfei,
>>>>
>>>> Does it occur every time?
>>>> If not, I think I have known the reason.
>>>
>>> Hi, Wenjian.
>>>
>>> This patch is applied directly on version 1.5.9. And makedumpfile hangs
>>> if option num-thread is appended.
>>>
>>
>> I see.
>> I'm working on it.
>>
>> BTW, did you only test it with --num-threads 128?
>> How is it with --num-threads 32(or smaller value)?
>
> Yes. I have tested with num-thread 1, 2, 8 and 32. Except for —num-threads 1,
> all of the test fail.
>
> Thanks
> Minfei
>>
>
>
>