[PATCH v24 5/9] arm64: kdump: add kdump support
AKASHI Takahiro
takahiro.akashi at linaro.org
Thu Aug 18 18:26:52 PDT 2016
James,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:15:48PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Hi James, Pratyush,
>
> Thank you for your testing and reporting an issue.
> I've been on vacation until yesterday.
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 05:38:05PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> > Hi Akashi,
> >
> > On 09/08/16 02:56, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > On crash dump kernel, all the information about primary kernel's system
> > > memory (core image) is available in elf core header.
> > > The primary kernel will set aside this header with reserve_elfcorehdr()
> > > at boot time and inform crash dump kernel of its location via a new
> > > device-tree property, "linux,elfcorehdr".
> > >
> > > Please note that all other architectures use traditional "elfcorehdr="
> > > kernel parameter for this purpose.
> > >
> > > Then crash dump kernel will access the primary kernel's memory with
> > > copy_oldmem_page(), which reads one page by ioremap'ing it since it does
> > > not reside in linear mapping on crash dump kernel.
> > >
> > > We also need our own elfcorehdr_read() here since the header is placed
> > > within crash dump kernel's usable memory.
> >
> > On Seattle when I panic and boot the kdump kernel, I am unable to read the
> > /proc/vmcore file. Instead I get:
> > nanook at frikadeller:~$ sudo cp /proc/vmcore /
> > [ 174.393875] Unhandled fault: synchronous external abort (0x96000210) at
> > 0xffffff80096b6000
> > [ 174.402158] Internal error: : 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > [ 174.407370] Modules linked in:
> > [ 174.410417] CPU: 6 PID: 2059 Comm: cp Tainted: G S W I 4.8.0-rc1+ #4708
> > [ 174.417799] Hardware name: AMD Overdrive/Supercharger/Default string, BIOS
> > ROD1002C 04/08/2016
> > [ 174.426396] task: ffffffc0fdec5780 task.stack: ffffffc0f34bc000
> > [ 174.432313] PC is at __arch_copy_to_user+0x180/0x280
> > [ 174.437274] LR is at copy_oldmem_page+0xac/0xf0
> > [ 174.441791] pc : [<ffffff800835e080>] lr : [<ffffff8008095b9c>] pstate: 20000145
> > [ 174.449173] sp : ffffffc0f34bfc90
> > [ 174.452474] x29: ffffffc0f34bfc90 x28: 0000000000000000
> > [ 174.457776] x27: 0000000008000000 x26: 000000000000d000
> > [ 174.463077] x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffff8008eb5000
> > [ 174.468378] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffff80096b6000
> > [ 174.473679] x21: 0000000000000001 x20: 0000000030127000
> > [ 174.478979] x19: 0000000000001000 x18: 0000007ff7085d60
> > [ 174.484279] x17: 0000000000429358 x16: ffffff80081d9e88
> > [ 174.489579] x15: 0000007fae377590 x14: 0000000000000000
> > [ 174.494880] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: ffffff8008dd1000
> > [ 174.500180] x11: ffffff80096b6fff x10: ffffff80096b6fff
> > [ 174.505480] x9 : 0000000040000000 x8 : ffffff8008db6000
> > [ 174.510781] x7 : ffffff80096b7000 x6 : 0000000030127000
> > [ 174.516082] x5 : 0000000030128000 x4 : 0000000000000000
> > [ 174.521382] x3 : 00e8000000000713 x2 : 0000000000000f80
> > [ 174.526682] x1 : ffffff80096b6000 x0 : 0000000030127000
> > [ 174.531982]
> > [ 174.533461] Process cp (pid: 2059, stack limit = 0xffffffc0f34bc020)
> >
> > [ 174.848448] [<ffffff800835e080>] __arch_copy_to_user+0x180/0x280
> > [ 174.854448] [<ffffff8008245f34>] read_from_oldmem.part.4+0xb4/0xf4
> > [ 174.860615] [<ffffff8008246074>] read_vmcore+0x100/0x22c
> > [ 174.865919] [<ffffff8008239378>] proc_reg_read+0x64/0x90
> > [ 174.871223] [<ffffff80081d7da8>] __vfs_read+0x28/0x108
> > [ 174.876348] [<ffffff80081d8ae4>] vfs_read+0x84/0x144
> > [ 174.881301] [<ffffff80081d9ecc>] SyS_read+0x44/0xa0
> > [ 174.886167] [<ffffff8008082ef0>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
> > [ 174.891466] Code: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 (a8c12027)
> > [ 174.897562] ---[ end trace 00801b2e35b0cd1f ]---
> >
> >
> > The offending call is:
> > > copy_oldmem_page(0x8000000, 0x00000000385f8000, 0x1000, 0, 1)
> >
> > This is trying to access the bottom page of memory. From the efi memory map:
> > > efi: 0x008000000000-0x008001e7ffff [Runtime Data |RUN| |WB|WT|WC|UC]*
> > > efi: 0x008001e80000-0x008001ffffff [Conventional Memory| | |WB|WT|WC|UC]
> >
> > This page is 'Runtime Data', and marked as nomap by both the original and kdump
> > kernels, but copy_oldmem_page() doesn't know this.
> >
> > In this case because we have already parsed the efi memory map again in the
> > kdump kernel and re-marked these regions as nomap, the below hunk fixes the
> > problem for me:
> > =========================%<=========================
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c
> > index 2dc54d129be1..784d4c30b534 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ ssize_t copy_oldmem_page(unsigned long pfn, char *buf,
> > if (!csize)
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if (memblock_is_memory(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) &&
> > + !memblock_is_map_memory(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))
> > + /* skip this nomap memory region, reserved by firmware */
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > vaddr = ioremap_cache(__pfn_to_phys(pfn), PAGE_SIZE);
>
> Here I'm wandering why my original code doesn't work.
> If !memblock_is_map_memory(), ioremap_cache() would call __ioremap_caller()
> and return a valid virtual address mapped in vmalloc area.
>
> > if (!vaddr)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > =========================%<=========================
> >
> > With this I can copy the vmcore file, and feed it to crash to read dmesg, task
> > list etc...
> >
> > This could be a deeper/wider issue, but I can't see any other users of
> > memblock_mark_nomap().
> > Do you think depending on this this 're-learning' is robust enough, or should
> > the nomap ranges be described in the vmcoreinfo elf notes?
>
> The current kexec-tools identifies all the memory regions from
> /proc/iomem and there is no way for user space tools to distinguish
> "EFI runtime data," or any other nomap memory, from normal "System RAM"
> because all those resources are currently marked as "System RAM."
>
> So I think that such regions should be marked as, say, "reserved,"
> so that we can exclude those memories from a crush dump file.
Can you try the following change?
If it fixes your problem, I will post it as a patch.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
===8<===
>From 740563e4a437f0d6ecf6e421c91433f9b8f19041 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:57:52 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: mark reserved memblock regions explicitly
---
arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
index 38eda13..38589b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -205,10 +205,15 @@ static void __init request_standard_resources(void)
for_each_memblock(memory, region) {
res = alloc_bootmem_low(sizeof(*res));
- res->name = "System RAM";
+ if (memblock_is_nomap(region)) {
+ res->name = "reserved";
+ res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
+ } else {
+ res->name = "System RAM";
+ res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
+ }
res->start = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(region));
res->end = __pfn_to_phys(memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(region)) - 1;
- res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
request_resource(&iomem_resource, res);
--
2.9.0
===>8===
> (I don't know whether this change may have a backward-compatibility
> problem.)
>
> -Takahiro AKASHI
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..2dc54d1
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/crash_dump.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * Routines for doing kexec-based kdump
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2014 Linaro Limited
> > > + * Author: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> > > + *
> > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> > > + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/crash_dump.h>
> > > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > > +#include <linux/memblock.h>
> > > +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > > +#include <asm/memory.h>
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * copy_oldmem_page() - copy one page from old kernel memory
> > > + * @pfn: page frame number to be copied
> > > + * @buf: buffer where the copied page is placed
> > > + * @csize: number of bytes to copy
> > > + * @offset: offset in bytes into the page
> > > + * @userbuf: if set, @buf is in a user address space
> > > + *
> > > + * This function copies one page from old kernel memory into buffer pointed by
> > > + * @buf. If @buf is in userspace, set @userbuf to %1. Returns number of bytes
> > > + * copied or negative error in case of failure.
> > > + */
> > > +ssize_t copy_oldmem_page(unsigned long pfn, char *buf,
> > > + size_t csize, unsigned long offset,
> > > + int userbuf)
> > > +{
> > > + void *vaddr;
> > > +
> > > + if (!csize)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + vaddr = ioremap_cache(__pfn_to_phys(pfn), PAGE_SIZE);
> > > + if (!vaddr)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + if (userbuf) {
> > > + if (copy_to_user(buf, vaddr + offset, csize)) {
> > > + iounmap(vaddr);
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > + }
> > > + } else {
> > > + memcpy(buf, vaddr + offset, csize);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + iounmap(vaddr);
> > > +
> > > + return csize;
> > > +}
> >
More information about the kexec
mailing list