[PATCH] ppc64: erase unnecessary segment info printing

Baoquan He bhe at redhat.com
Sun Feb 8 22:03:35 PST 2015


On 02/09/15 at 02:55pm, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:19:55PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > In ppc64 loading, it will print the segment information. This is not
> > wanted since other Archs don't have this. People even think there's
> > something wrong. So erase it to make it be consistent with other Archs.
> > 
> > And if people really want to check these info, they can specify "-d"
> > option. They are printed in print_segments() too.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe at redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks, applied.

Thanks, Simon.

> 
> > ---
> >  kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c | 4 ----
> >  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c b/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c
> > index ce10367..4a1540e 100644
> > --- a/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c
> > +++ b/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c
> > @@ -377,10 +377,6 @@ int elf_ppc64_load(int argc, char **argv, const char *buf, off_t len,
> >  	dbgprintf("opal_base is %llx\n", (unsigned long long) my_opal_base);
> >  	dbgprintf("opal_entry is %llx\n", (unsigned long long) my_opal_entry);
> >  
> > -	for (i = 0; i < info->nr_segments; i++)
> > -		fprintf(stderr, "segment[%d].mem:%p memsz:%zu\n", i,
> > -			info->segment[i].mem, info->segment[i].memsz);
> > -
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -- 
> > 1.9.0
> > 



More information about the kexec mailing list