[PATCH] ppc64: erase unnecessary segment info printing
Baoquan He
bhe at redhat.com
Sun Feb 8 22:03:35 PST 2015
On 02/09/15 at 02:55pm, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 04:19:55PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > In ppc64 loading, it will print the segment information. This is not
> > wanted since other Archs don't have this. People even think there's
> > something wrong. So erase it to make it be consistent with other Archs.
> >
> > And if people really want to check these info, they can specify "-d"
> > option. They are printed in print_segments() too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe at redhat.com>
>
> Thanks, applied.
Thanks, Simon.
>
> > ---
> > kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c b/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c
> > index ce10367..4a1540e 100644
> > --- a/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c
> > +++ b/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c
> > @@ -377,10 +377,6 @@ int elf_ppc64_load(int argc, char **argv, const char *buf, off_t len,
> > dbgprintf("opal_base is %llx\n", (unsigned long long) my_opal_base);
> > dbgprintf("opal_entry is %llx\n", (unsigned long long) my_opal_entry);
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < info->nr_segments; i++)
> > - fprintf(stderr, "segment[%d].mem:%p memsz:%zu\n", i,
> > - info->segment[i].mem, info->segment[i].memsz);
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.0
> >
More information about the kexec
mailing list