[PATCH V4] kernel, add bug_on_warn

[Dave Young]

> > Seems reasonable-I'm wondering why you just don't call panic() in this
> > case. The BUG() call at line '434' doesn't at anything since its just being
> > called from panic.c.
> 
> Hmm ... I didn't even think about that.
> 
> > 
> > So something like 'panic_on_warn' would seem to be more appropriate
> > in keeping with things like 'panic_on_oops' or 'panic_on_stackoverflow'.
> 
> I like it a lot better that way too :)  I'm changing it to panic_on_warn unless
> anyone has any strenuous objections.

I would vote for panic_on_warn, it will make more sense than bug_on_warn.

Thanks
Dave