[patch 1/4] Add function get_bootparam

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Mon Oct 28 00:20:56 EDT 2013


On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:30:32AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 10/28/13 at 09:13am, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > @@ -447,7 +446,7 @@ void setup_subarch(struct x86_linux_para
> > > >  	if (!debugfs_mnt)
> > > >  		return;
> > > >  	snprintf(filename, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", debugfs_mnt, "boot_params/data");
> > > > -	filename[PATH_MAX-1] = 0;
> > > > +	filename[PATH_MAX - 1] = 0;
> > > >  	free(debugfs_mnt);
> > > 
> > > This change appears to be unrelated to the rest of the patch.
> > > 
> > 
> > Will remove the change from the patch.
> 
> Relooking it, with this patch the line "filename[PATH_MAX - 1] = 0;"
> is in the share function get_bootparam, it's not in setup_subarch
> any more so I think it's ok, what do you think?

I'm a bit confused.

My reading of the hunk above is that it is a whitespace-only change.
If so it is not a change that I object to but also not one that
I feel belongs in this patch. If not I am somehow mistaken.



More information about the kexec mailing list