[PATCHv10 0/9] Xen: extend kexec hypercall for use with pv-ops kernels
JBeulich at suse.com
Fri Nov 8 08:19:49 EST 2013
>>> On 08.11.13 at 14:13, David Vrabel <david.vrabel at citrix.com> wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to CC you on this series.
> Can we have your opinion on whether this kexec series can be merged?
> And if not, what further work and/or testing is required?
Just to clarify - unless I missed something, there was still no
review of this from Daniel or someone else known to be
familiar with the subject. If Keir gave his ack, formally this
could go in, but I wouldn't feel too well with that (the more
that apart from not having reviewed it, Daniel seems to also
continue to have problems with it).
More information about the kexec