[RFC] makedumpfile: Improve reading speed with mmap()
HATAYAMA Daisuke
d.hatayama at jp.fujitsu.com
Wed Mar 6 04:13:50 EST 2013
From: Atsushi Kumagai <kumagai-atsushi at mxc.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [RFC] makedumpfile: Improve reading speed with mmap()
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:48:04 +0900
> Hello,
>
> I made the prototype patch to use mmap() on /proc/vmcore for
> benchmarking.
>
> This patch simply replaces read(2) with mmap(2), I think we can see
> the pure performance improvement by reducing the number of map/unmap.
>
> - When /proc/vmcore supports mmap(), readmem() calls read_with_mmap()
> to read /proc/vmcore with mmap() instead of read().
>
> - Introduce --map-size <Kbyte> option to specify the map size.
> This option is necessary to use mmap() in this patch, but just for
> benchmarking. I'll remove this option in release version and change
> the map size into suitable constant size to get enough performance
> improvement.
>
> - This patch is based on devel branch:
> http://makedumpfile.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=makedumpfile/makedumpfile;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/devel
>
> Unfortunately, I haven't done test and benchmarking in 2nd kernel yet
> because I can't start up newer kernel as 2nd kernel on my machine.
> (It seems just my environment issue.)
>
> At least, this patch works for vmcores saved on local disk,
> so it will work in 2nd kernel too.
>
> If anyone helps to do benchmarking, it's very helpful for me.
> And any comments for this patch are welcome.
Kumagai-san,
I think it necessary to compare this generic one with the idea
considering virtual memory mapping, which should affect filtering
performance to some degree.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2013-February/007982.html
I guess implementation can relatively be moduler. I'll post a
prorotype patch for benchmark later.
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke
More information about the kexec
mailing list