[PATCH] kexec: return error of machine_kexec() fails
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederm at xmission.com
Wed Jul 10 10:36:33 EDT 2013
Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> writes:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>
> Prior to commit 3ab8352 "kexec jump", if machine_kexec() returned,
> sys_reboot() would return -EINVAL. This patch restores this behaviour
> for the non-KEXEC_JUMP case, where machine_kexec() is not expected to
> return.
>
> This situation can occur on ARM, where kexec requires disabling all but
> one CPU using CPU hotplug. However, if hotplug isn't supported by the
> particular HW the kernel is running on, then kexec cannot succeed.
Ugh. This reasoning is nonsense. Prior to the kexec jump work
machine_kexec could never return and so could never return -EINVAL.
It is not ok to have an image loaded that we can not kexec. kexec_load
should fail not machine_shutdown or machine_kexec.
The only time that machine_kexec can validly return is in the kexec_jump
case, and that is a successful return.
So formally.
Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm at xmission.com>
My apologies for not speaking up sooner the broken ARM mutli-cpu
shutdown architecture hurts my brain to think about
ARM needs to get it's act together and stop modifying the generic code
to deal with it's broken multi-cpu architecture.
Eric
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> Acked-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei at cn.fujitsu.com>
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
> ---
> kernel/kexec.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> Andrew, could you consider picking up this patch?
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
> index 59f7b55..bde1190 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
> @@ -1702,6 +1702,8 @@ int kernel_kexec(void)
> pm_restore_console();
> unlock_system_sleep();
> }
> +#else
> + error = -EINVAL;
> #endif
>
> Unlock:
More information about the kexec
mailing list