[PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression"

H. Peter Anvin hpa at zytor.com
Sat Aug 11 14:39:13 EDT 2012

On 08/11/2012 11:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>>> This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might
>>> be a better solution.
>>> [PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that
>>> are being mapped
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540
>> Actually, apply that series of 5 patches.
> I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip.
> However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying
> the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that.  On the other
> hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway.

Ah, right... still waiting for a rev of the patch to address Yinghai's 
legitimate request for minor code restructuring.  Other than that, the 
patchset is really The Right Thing.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

More information about the kexec mailing list