[PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression"
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Sat Aug 11 14:39:13 EDT 2012
On 08/11/2012 11:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might
>>> be a better solution.
>>>
>>> [PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that
>>> are being mapped
>>>
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540
>>>
>> Actually, apply that series of 5 patches.
>>
>
> I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip.
>
> However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying
> the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that. On the other
> hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway.
>
Ah, right... still waiting for a rev of the patch to address Yinghai's
legitimate request for minor code restructuring. Other than that, the
patchset is really The Right Thing.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
More information about the kexec
mailing list