Crash during vmcore_init
Tim Hartrick
tim at edgecast.com
Thu Nov 17 11:40:33 EST 2011
Dave, Tejun, Americo,
Attached find three configs:
Ubuntu 2.6.32-21-server - works
Ubuntu 2.6.38-8-server - fails
Ubuntu 3.3.1-030101-generic (stable) - fails
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 15:21 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 01:22 PM, Tim Hartrick wrote:
>
> > Tejun, Dave,
> >
> > I will be happy to answer any questions about our environment or test
> > debug or other patches. Just tell me what you need.
>
>
> Thank you. Can you share your kernel config?
>
> >
> > tim
> >
> > On Nov 16, 2011 8:44 PM, "Dave Young" <dyoung at redhat.com
> > <mailto:dyoung at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/17/2011 12:34 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Dave Young <dyoung at redhat.com
> > <mailto:dyoung at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > >> This addr is converted to an invalid phys address,
> > >
> > > I'm a bit lost on the context here. Who's calling
> > per_cpu_ptr_to_phys()?
> >
> >
> > It's drivers/base/cpu.c : show_crash_notes()
> >
> > >
> > >> looking the code below:
> > >> if (in_first_chunk) {
> > >> if (!is_vmalloc_addr(addr))
> > >> return __pa(addr);
> > >> else
> > >> return page_to_phys(vmalloc_to_page(addr));
> > >> } else
> > >> return page_to_phys(pcpu_addr_to_page(addr));
> > >>
> > >> I dont understand per cpu allocation well, if addr is not in
> > first chunk
> > >> then it should be in vmalloc area?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is. First chunk can be embedded in the kernel linear address
> > > space but from the second one, it's always set up from the top of the
> > > vmalloc area with the same offset layout as the first chunk.
> >
> >
> > in this case ffff880667c19ad0 fall out of vmalloc area and it's not in
> > first chunk also.
> >
> > >
> > >> Tejun, do you have any idea about this?
> > >
> > > Can you please tell me how to reproduce the problem? I'll try to find
> > > out what's going on.
> >
> >
> > make sure kernel support CRASH DUMP, then cat
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[x]/crash_notes
> >
> > Tim Hartrick <tim at edgecast.com <mailto:tim at edgecast.com>> reported
> > the problem when test kdump.
> > But I can not reproduce this. I think tim can help to test
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks
> > Dave
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: config-2.6.32-21-server
Type: text/x-mpsub
Size: 110473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/attachments/20111117/35041468/attachment-0003.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: config-2.6.38-8-server
Type: text/x-mpsub
Size: 130421 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/attachments/20111117/35041468/attachment-0004.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: config-3.1.1-030101-generic
Type: text/x-mpsub
Size: 136284 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/attachments/20111117/35041468/attachment-0005.bin>
More information about the kexec
mailing list