[PATCH] add kexec-tools support for armv6l processors

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Thu Nov 19 08:22:03 EST 2009

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:17:34AM +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> Hello Simon,
> what's the point of adding a single arm family?
> As we discussed before, the check done in phys_arch.c will often fail
> (e.g. kernels utsname are armv5tel).
> Are you going to add each arm family with respective endianness?

Sorry, that conversation had slipped my mind.
To be honest, at this point I'm unsure what
the best approach is.

More information about the kexec mailing list