[PATCH] [PPC64] Fix memory corruption when using realloc_memory_ranges()
Bernhard Walle
bwalle at suse.de
Fri Jan 16 13:11:34 EST 2009
Because realloc_memory_ranges() makes the old memory invalid, and we return
a pointer to memory_range in get_memory_ranges(), we need to copy the contents
in get_memory_ranges().
Some code that calls realloc_memory_ranges() may be triggered by
get_base_ranges() which is called after get_memory_ranges().
Yes, the memory needs to be deleted somewhere, but I don't know currently
where it's the best, and since it's not in a loop and memory is deleted
anyway after program termination I don't want to introduce unneccessary
complexity. The problem is that get_base_ranges() gets called from
architecture independent code and that allocation is PPC64-specific here.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle at suse.de>diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-ppc64.c b/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-ppc64.c
index b0d8acd..ad8a31c 100644
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle at suse.de>
---
kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-ppc64.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-ppc64.c b/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-ppc64.c
index b0d8acd..ad8a31c 100644
--- a/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-ppc64.c
+++ b/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-ppc64.c
@@ -715,7 +715,16 @@ int get_memory_ranges(struct memory_range **range, int *ranges,
if (setup_memory_ranges(kexec_flags))
return -1;
- *range = memory_range;
+ /*
+ * copy the memory here, another realloc_memory_ranges might
+ * corrupt the old memory
+ */
+ *range = calloc(sizeof(struct memory_range), nr_memory_ranges);
+ if (*range == NULL)
+ return -1;
+ memmove(*range, memory_range,
+ sizeof(struct memory_range) * nr_memory_ranges);
+
*ranges = nr_memory_ranges;
fprintf(stderr, "get memory ranges:%d\n", nr_memory_ranges);
return 0;
--
1.6.0.2
More information about the kexec
mailing list