[PATCH 0/5 + 2] kexec updates
miltonm at bga.com
Tue Jan 13 10:59:08 EST 2009
On Jan 12, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 02:42:38PM -0600, Milton Miller wrote:
>> Follwing this mail are 5 patches for kexec userspace and two for the
>> kernel. The first fixes an array overflow and the second updates
>> userspace to the merged 2.6.28 kdump support. The remaining are
>> cleanups and warning fixes, including one for the common code.
>> The two patchs for the kernel are independent.
> Hi all,
> sorry to be a bit slow in responding, this email landed just
> as I was leaving for a weeks holiday.
No problem, I figured as much.
> The kexec-tools patches seem reasonable to me and I'm happy to merge
> what I
> think are the latest versions - thanks Michael for your review.
> Milton, here are the Subjects, Dates and Message-Ids of what I have in
> queue. If you could confirm this or repost that would be great.
> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools v2] ppc64: always check number of ranges
> when adding them
> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:33:50 -0600
> Message-ID: <1231418030_141769 at mercury.realtime.net>
> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 2/5] ppc64: update kdump for 2.6.28
> relocatable kernel
> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:42 -0600
> Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-2r.miltonm at bga.com>
> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 3/5] ppc64: segments may be reordered
> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:45 -0600
> Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-3r.miltonm at bga.com>
> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 4/5] ppc64: cleanups
> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:48 -0600
> Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-4r.miltonm at bga.com>
> Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 5/5] entry wants to be void *
> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:51 -0600
> Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-5r.miltonm at bga.com>
Based on the subjects, yes, those are the lastest versions.
And I assume you saw Mohan's tested message.
More information about the kexec