kexec reboot broken with ioatdma?
dan.j.williams at intel.com
Wed Dec 16 18:11:44 EST 2009
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > from a kexec point of view I believe that the preferred option is the
> > former - shutdown the device so it can be initialised using standard paths
> > in the second kernel.
> OK... however I'm not suggesting a separate kexec initialization path,
> simply adding a reset of the device in the standard initialization.
> This would be fairly normal for other types of device; for example, the
> BIOS may have left a NIC in an undefined state due to network boot. Of
> course BIOS is unlikely to use an IOAT DMA engine but the principle of
> limiting assumptions about platform state still stands I think.
I agree that is more robust if the init path copes with hardware
arriving in an unknown state. I'll look into adding a channel reset in
the init path (something that should probably have been there since the
> From a quick look, it seems tricky to get a clean shutdown of IOAT stuff
> since there doesn't seem to be a clean ordering that makes sure the
> ioatdma stuff is shutdown after everything using it.
The engines may be in use by multiple subsytems (net, raid) so
coordinating shutdown ordering would indeed be a pain.
More information about the kexec