[patch] ia64: Order of operations bug in PT_LOAD segment reader

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Wed Oct 8 18:09:23 EDT 2008

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:56:49AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> writes:
> > The bug comes about because the break statment was never executed because
> > the if clause would bever be true because the if clause will never be true
> > because &  has higher precedence than !=.
>                  ^^^^^^
>                  lower


Simon Horman
  VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
  H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/             W: www.valinux.co.jp/en

More information about the kexec mailing list