kdump broken on Altix 350
Simon Horman
horms at verge.net.au
Thu Oct 2 01:13:50 EDT 2008
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:42:52PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Does this make kexec/kdump happier? Bare minimum testing so far
> (builds and boots on tiger ... didn't try kexec yet).
Hi Tony,
your analysis (in your previous email) was more or less the same
conclusion that I had come too, though I was puzzling over
why you had put the reserved area for cpu0 where you had - I assumed
I was misunderstanding things.
This patch looks good to me.
Jay,
With this patch I assume that we still need an order of operations fix for
kexec-tools but no section merging changes. Is that correct?
--
Simon Horman
VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: www.valinux.co.jp/en
More information about the kexec
mailing list