[PATCH -mm 2/2] kexec jump -v12: save/restore device state
ying.huang at intel.com
Tue Jul 15 01:19:04 EDT 2008
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 09:48 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> You have cited various possible use cases of this patchset. Which is
> the specific feature you are planning to use?
I think two features are useful:
1. Kexec based hibernation
2. Do kdump then continue
> Thinking more about it, what's the compelling feature out of this list
> which makes this patchset a strong candidate for inclusion?
> Regarding hibernation, Rafael does not think this is the way to go
> for future.
I think kexec based hibernation can be a better hibernation scheme, at
least more code sharing.
More information about the kexec