[PATCH] x86: Move crashkernel reservation before dma32_reserve_bootmem()
Bernhard Walle
bwalle at suse.de
Mon Jul 14 09:37:24 EDT 2008
* Vivek Goyal [2008-07-14 09:30]:
>
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 08:49:44PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > From: Bernhard Walle <bernhard.walle at gmx.de>
> >
> > On a x86-64 machine (nothing special I could encounter) I had the problem that
> > crashkernel reservation with the usual "64M at 16M" failed. While debugging that,
> > I encountered that dma32_reserve_bootmem() reserves a memory region which is in
> > that area.
> >
> > Because dma32_reserve_bootmem() does not rely on a specific offset but
> > crashkernel does, it makes sense to move the crashkernel reservation up a bit.
> > I tested that patch and it works without problems. I don't see any negative
> > effects of that move, but maybe I oversaw something ...
> >
> > While the long-term solution is to make the crashkernel reservation dynamic
> > (which is already done in -tip), this bug should be fixed also short-term for
> > 2.6.26 (or 2.6.26-stable if it's too short), and that's why I made that patch.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle at suse.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bernhard.walle at gmx.de>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> > index 6dff128..158cefe 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> > @@ -444,6 +444,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > contig_initmem_init(0, end_pfn);
> > #endif
> >
> > + /*
> > + * dma32_reserve_bootmem() allocates bootmem which may conflict
> > + * with the crashkernel command line, so do that before
> > + */
> > + reserve_crashkernel();
> > +
> > dma32_reserve_bootmem();
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> > @@ -484,7 +490,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> > }
> > }
> > #endif
> > - reserve_crashkernel();
> >
> > reserve_ibft_region();
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com>
Greg,
would that be something for -stable?
Bernhard
--
Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development
More information about the kexec
mailing list