[Patch ] Kexec/Kdump support - POWER6

Sachin P. Sant sachinp at in.ibm.com
Mon May 28 07:40:57 EDT 2007

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> If you're going to use the B (1T segment) bit instead of the bolted bit,
> at least define a proper constant in line with the existing naming of
> the hash table constants in mmu-hash64.h. I would suggest doing the same
> with the VRMA_MASK/VALUE thing and calling it HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK or
> something similar.
Well i had used them properly in my previous patches. Don't know why
i changed it in this patch :-( 

Here is the updated patch. 

>> +	}
>>  }
> In addition, I would recommend following Michael's advice and using
> using the bulk remove Hcall whenever possible.
Yes will send out a separate patch to use bulk remove Hcall.


Signed-off-by : Sachin Sant <sachinp at in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by : Mohan Kumar M <mohan at in.ibm.com>

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: kexec-kdump-support-on-POWER6
Url: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/attachments/20070528/36c4bb45/attachment.pl 

More information about the kexec mailing list