[patch] add kdump_after_notifier

Bernhard Walle bwalle at suse.de
Thu Jul 26 12:21:34 EDT 2007


* Bernhard Walle <bwalle at suse.de> [2007-07-26 18:14]:
> * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at in.ibm.com> [2007-07-26 17:54]:
> > 
> > That's true. Its not mainline. We had similar discussion in the past
> > also. I think we should allow only audited code to be run after panic().
> > Leaving it open to modules or unaudited code makes this solution
> > something like LKCD where whole lot of code used to run after the crash,
> > hence was unreliable.
> > 
> > If KDB goes mainline, then I think it is not a bad idea to call debugger
> > first (if it is enabled) and then one can trigger crash dump from inside
> > the debugger.
> 
> Well, after thinking again about this, I think the best solution would
> to call kdump from KDB with a command as it was done by LKCD.

Ok, but that doesn't solve the problem (it would solve the opposite
problem).

My question is: Why cannot kdump use the notifier call chain? Wouldn't
this simplify things in general, apart from KDB. Not talking about the
priority of kdump now ...


Thanks,
   Bernhard




More information about the kexec mailing list