[RFC] hostapd: DFS - handle running out of DFS channels

Zefir Kurtisi zefir.kurtisi at neratec.com
Mon Mar 7 03:20:13 PST 2016

On 03/07/2016 11:35 AM, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:02:39AM +0100, Zefir Kurtisi wrote:
>> We have been using this modification (slightly updated) in our systems for half a
>> year now and it works as expected. I'll update the RFC and re-post it as patch.
> Thanks.
>> While at that, I could add a dedicated state HAPD_IFACE_NOP instead of combining
>> state and cac_started as NOP indication. Would help readability a bit. Preference?
> If it does not make the changes significantly more complex, it'd
> probable be a good idea to make it clearer why the "extra" wait is
> ongoing.
After double-checking, it would add readability at one place but complicate it on
other where HAPD_IFACE_DFS is handled. I left it as is and added a comment for

More information about the Hostap mailing list