[PATCH 07/15] wpa_supplicant: Refactor wpas_rrm_build_lci_report()
Andrei Otcheretianski
andrei.otcheretianski at intel.com
Wed Dec 28 05:06:39 PST 2016
From: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern at intel.com>
1. Change the return type to reflect whether building the report
succeeded or failed.
2. Change argument type to rrm_measurement_request_element instead
of raw packet data to ease processing the request.
3. Use already existing function to create the measurement report
and add it to the report buffer.
Signed-off-by: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern at intel.com>
---
wpa_supplicant/rrm.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/wpa_supplicant/rrm.c b/wpa_supplicant/rrm.c
index 584b1c4..696dd26 100644
--- a/wpa_supplicant/rrm.c
+++ b/wpa_supplicant/rrm.c
@@ -297,34 +297,34 @@ static int wpas_rrm_report_elem(struct wpabuf *buf, u8 token, u8 mode, u8 type,
}
-static struct wpabuf * wpas_rrm_build_lci_report(struct wpa_supplicant *wpa_s,
- const u8 *request, size_t len,
- struct wpabuf *report)
+static int
+wpas_rrm_build_lci_report(struct wpa_supplicant *wpa_s,
+ struct rrm_measurement_request_element *req,
+ struct wpabuf **buf)
{
- u8 token, type, subject;
+ u8 subject;
u16 max_age = 0;
struct os_reltime t, diff;
unsigned long diff_l;
- u8 *ptoken;
const u8 *subelem;
+ const u8 *request = req->variable;
+ size_t len = req->len - 3;
+
+ if (len < 4)
+ return -1;
- if (!wpa_s->lci || len < 3 + 4)
- return report;
+ if (!wpa_s->lci)
+ goto reject;
- token = *request++;
- /* Measurement request mode isn't used */
- request++;
- type = *request++;
subject = *request++;
- wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG,
- "Measurement request token %u type %u location subject %u",
- token, type, subject);
+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "Measurement request location subject=%d",
+ subject);
- if (type != MEASURE_TYPE_LCI || subject != LOCATION_SUBJECT_REMOTE) {
+ if (subject != LOCATION_SUBJECT_REMOTE) {
wpa_printf(MSG_INFO,
- "Not building LCI report - bad type or location subject");
- return report;
+ "Not building LCI report - bad location subject");
+ return 0;
}
/* Subelements are formatted exactly like elements */
@@ -333,26 +333,43 @@ static struct wpabuf * wpas_rrm_build_lci_report(struct wpa_supplicant *wpa_s,
max_age = WPA_GET_LE16(subelem + 2);
if (os_get_reltime(&t))
- return report;
+ goto reject;
os_reltime_sub(&t, &wpa_s->lci_time, &diff);
/* LCI age is calculated in 10th of a second units. */
diff_l = diff.sec * 10 + diff.usec / 100000;
if (max_age != 0xffff && max_age < diff_l)
- return report;
+ goto reject;
+
+ if (wpabuf_resize(buf, 2 + wpabuf_len(wpa_s->lci)))
+ return -1;
+
+ if (wpas_rrm_report_elem(*buf, req->token,
+ MEASUREMENT_REPORT_MODE_ACCEPT, req->type,
+ wpabuf_head_u8(wpa_s->lci),
+ wpabuf_len(wpa_s->lci)) < 0) {
+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "Failed to add LCI report element");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
- if (wpabuf_resize(&report, 2 + wpabuf_len(wpa_s->lci)))
- return report;
+reject:
+ if (wpabuf_resize(buf, sizeof(struct rrm_measurement_report_element))) {
+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG,
+ "RRM: Memory allocation failed");
+ return -1;
+ }
- wpabuf_put_u8(report, WLAN_EID_MEASURE_REPORT);
- wpabuf_put_u8(report, wpabuf_len(wpa_s->lci));
- /* We'll override user's measurement token */
- ptoken = wpabuf_put(report, 0);
- wpabuf_put_buf(report, wpa_s->lci);
- *ptoken = token;
+ if (wpas_rrm_report_elem(*buf, req->token,
+ MEASUREMENT_REPORT_MODE_REJECT_INCAPABLE,
+ req->type, NULL, 0) < 0) {
+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "RRM: Failed to add report element");
+ return -1;
+ }
- return report;
+ return 0;
}
@@ -382,9 +399,7 @@ wpas_rrm_handle_msr_req_element(struct wpa_supplicant *wpa_s,
switch (req->type) {
case MEASURE_TYPE_LCI:
- *buf = wpas_rrm_build_lci_report(wpa_s, &req->token, req->len,
- *buf);
- return 0;
+ return wpas_rrm_build_lci_report(wpa_s, req, buf);
default:
wpa_printf(MSG_INFO,
"RRM: unsupported radio measurement type %hhu",
--
1.9.1
More information about the Hostap
mailing list