Iperf measurenment

[Ramon Fontes]

I have tested IPv6 and I got the same results. :(

2015-05-12 8:24 GMT-03:00 Ramon Fontes <ramonreisfontes at gmail.com>:

> Hi Janusz, than you.
>
> Is there another option to use network namespace instead of netns? I have
> defined the network namespace to stations, like the image attached. If I
> use tcpdump on the ap I can see the packets from one to another station and
> if they are not connected to ap, it not possible ping between them.
>
> -- Sent from my android
> Em 12/05/2015 02:31, "Janusz Dziedzic" <janusz.dziedzic at tieto.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> On 11 May 2015 at 13:45, Ramon Fontes <ramonreisfontes at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Mr Bhave, thank you for your reply. Look at this image
>> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/0vobpagbvp4sifn/Screenshot1.png?dl=0. The
>> average
>> > is more than 1Gb, but I am using mode G. What is wrong with my topology?
>> >
>> You have wlan1/wlan2 on the same PC - same IPv4 class. Traffic
>> wlan1<->wlan2 never goes via AP (air) while IP stack is smart enough
>> and send them directly between interfaces.
>> You can use ipv6 scope link instead of ipv4 addresses (iperf -V
>> option) or use network namespaces.
>>
>> BR
>> Janusz
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.shmoo.com/pipermail/hostap/attachments/20150512/1671a790/attachment.htm>