Jörg Krause joerg.krause
Mon Mar 16 09:18:37 PDT 2015

On Sa, 2015-03-14 at 11:56 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:14:43PM +0100, J?rg Krause wrote:
> > I answer myself to my mail. I did some debugging and studied the
> > sources. For hostapd AP_EVENT_DISABLED is propagated in
> > hostapd_disable_iface() after receiving a 'DISABLE' command.
> Yes, but that event was not indicated for other paths (e.g., the main
> path of removing a full radio interface which is the case with
> wpa_supplicant AP mode).
> > In case of wpa_supplicant after receiving a 'DISABLE_NETWORK' for an AP
> > network at a certain point wpa_supplicant_mark_disassoc() is called
> > which in return calls wpa_supplicant_ap_deinit(). And I think somewhere
> > here the event messages AP-DISABLED and CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED should
> > be propagated.
> > 
> > What do you think? Where should the wpa_msg for AP-DISABLED and
> wpa_supplicant_ap_deinit() sounds reasonable for the wpa_supplicant
> specific CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED event and hostapd_bss_deinit() for
> AP-DISABLED. I added these to hostap.git to make the events more
> consistent.

Many thanks for the patches and nice to see them in 2.4. Now my
wpa_action script works as intended!

More information about the Hostap mailing list