[PATCH] Migrate from /var/run to /run

[sven falempin]

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Holger Schurig <holgerschurig at gmail.com>wrote:

> Arend, I fear that those "deployed systems" that don't do the switch from
> /var/run to /run will also not do the switch from
> wpa_supplicant_<antique-version> to wpa_supplicant_2.x.
>
>
> 2013/1/31 Arend van Spriel <arend at broadcom.com>
>
>> On 01/31/2013 02:10 PM, Jouke Witteveen wrote:
>> > Nevertheless I do think this should be merged. The critiques by Sven
>> > Falempin and Ben Greear do not seem entirely correct and at least the
>> > following distributions have already made the switch (so things should
>> > only improve there): Arch Linux, Debian, Fedora, Suse, Ubuntu.
>>
>> They may have, but you seem to be simply overstepping the fact that
>> there are a lot of deployed systems out there that do not have made the
>> switch and may have no intention to make it at all. Can you hold the
>> patch for another 5 years so those system are safely turned to compost ;-)
>>
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> > - Jouke
>>
>>

i just dont like constant in code, if all the linux system choose to yet
again to become 'different' and adopt /run instead of /var/run 'because
/var is not mounted' i see no reason for keepinf /var//run as a default,
but a DEFINE in config.h or even in .config would make a good deal ,
wouldnt it ?


>  Regards,
>> Arend
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HostAP mailing list
>> HostAP at lists.shmoo.com
>> http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/hostap
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HostAP mailing list
> HostAP at lists.shmoo.com
> http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/hostap
>
>


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.shmoo.com/pipermail/hostap/attachments/20130201/91def4bd/attachment.htm