[PATCH] dbus: Making the peer's properties acessible separately
Flávio Ceolin
flavio.ceolin
Fri Feb 17 12:09:12 PST 2012
Hi Angie and Jouni
2012/2/17 Fl?vio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin at profusion.mobi>:
> Hi Angie,
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Jouni Malinen <j at w1.fi> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:34:18PM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>> When the patch came in I wrongly assumed that the types will remain as
>>> before, just the interface changed ... Thanks to Jouni for catching
>>> these. From what I can tell the vendor extensions property type is still
>>> different from before. Could this not perhaps remain as bytes?
>>
>> The problem there was that the previous mechanism used a dictionary and
>> that does not have these types defined as clearly in introspection
>> information.. Otherwise it would have been trivial for me to enforce
>> them to remain same - now I did my best, but I'm not very familiar with
>> D-Bus..
>>
>> In other words, yes, please take a closer look at the types that are in
>> hostap.git now and propose a patch to change them if anything needs
>> modification.
>>
>> --
>> Jouni Malinen ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?PGP id EFC895FA
>> _______________________________________________
>> HostAP mailing list
>> HostAP at lists.shmoo.com
>> http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/hostap
>
> I'm on a holiday, but the patch is pretty close to be finished,
> sorry for the late. This last week I was in a hurry.
>
> Regards,
> Flavio Ceolin
Just one more question, do you want keep compatibility
with the current P2PDevice properties interface ?
Regards,
Flavio Ceolin
More information about the Hostap
mailing list