[PATCH] Prevent explicit scan command during scan or association
Jouni Malinen
j
Mon Apr 11 11:44:11 PDT 2011
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:45:12PM -0700, Dmitry Shmidt wrote:
> diff --git a/wpa_supplicant/ctrl_iface.c b/wpa_supplicant/ctrl_iface.c
> index 4f3f7e0..c48d1a7 100644
> @@ -3181,8 +3181,14 @@ char * wpa_supplicant_ctrl_iface_process(struct
> wpa_supplicant *wpa_s,
> if (wpa_s->wpa_state == WPA_INTERFACE_DISABLED)
> reply_len = -1;
> else {
> - wpa_s->scan_req = 2;
> - wpa_supplicant_req_scan(wpa_s, 0, 0);
> + if (!wpa_s->scanning &&
> + ((wpa_s->wpa_state <= WPA_SCANNING) ||
> + (wpa_s->wpa_state == WPA_COMPLETED))) {
> + wpa_s->scan_req = 2;
> + wpa_supplicant_req_scan(wpa_s, 0, 0);
> + } else {
> + wpa_printf(MSG_ERROR, "Ongoing Scan action");
> + }
Hmm.. This would still indicate success to the program that requested
the scan. That does not sound reasonable. At minimum, this would need to
return something like FAIL-BUSY instead of OK in the case that the
request was not accepted. It should also be noted that scan request can
be made over the D-Bus interface and it would probably be a good idea to
handle these in the same way with the ctrl_interface command.
--
Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
More information about the Hostap
mailing list