wpa_supplicant messaging
Jouni Malinen
jkmaline
Sun May 8 15:58:20 PDT 2005
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:54:53PM +0200, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> I still think it should be a part of the wpa_supplicant executable for
> two reasons:
>
> 1. Having one additional process just for starting scripts seems like
> resource waste.
Separate process is needed in order not to make it more difficult to
implement privacy separation in wpa_supplicant. I don't want to add new
functionality that requires root privileges after startup into
wpa_supplicant if that can be easily avoided.
> 2. Having one configuration file for configuring all wireless stuff
> would be better for the user than a bunch of places that have to be
> edited.
If that is really desired, it can be implemented by using this single
file for generating whatever is needed..
--
Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
More information about the Hostap
mailing list