essid_len in SIOCSIWESSID
Tue Aug 31 10:08:44 PDT 2004
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 07:49:16PM -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 09:37:17AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> > For some reasons, Wireless Extensions standardised on :
> > SSID length + 1
> OK, I'll try to remember this. However, this brings in couple of extra
> > Moreover, most of the tools and the driver also assume it's a
> > C string and will stop at the first ASCII-0. It might be possible to
> > fix this without having to rework the API, but nobody was bothered
> > enough to send me patches.
> So, is ioctl() caller supposed to always give a buffer of SSID len + 1
> to the driver? Even when iwr.u.essid.length would end up being 33 (i.e.,
> larger than IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE)?
Correct. The ioctl definition in wireless.c specifies
IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE + 1.
> What about SIOCGIWESSID? Is ioctl() caller supposed to always give a
> buffer of 33 bytes and set iwr.u.essid.length to 33 in order to be able
> to receive SSID of maximum length (32 characters, plus than one extra
> character for nul termination)?
Yep. You can check iwlib.c for this.
> What is the driver supposed to do if
> iwr.u.essid.length == 32 and SSID len is 32? Should it return -E2BIG?
With the new API, you don't have to worry about that. The
buffer will always be 33 bytes. The code in wireless.c itself deals
with the -E2BIG.
> Should it leave out nul termination and leave .length == 32? Is .length
> set to SSID len + 1 on SIOCGIWESSID in general?
> Somehow, I think I may have asked these questions before, but at least I
> don't remember the answer anymore.. ;-)
Don't worry, I admit it's a bit confusing.
> Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
More information about the Hostap