Basic Q's re wpa_supplicant
Morgan Read
mstuff
Mon Aug 30 08:56:55 PDT 2004
Had assumed the "ias_quirk" I was speaking of referred to issues
referred to at "17 May 2004" here: <http://open1x.sourceforge.net/>
But, on looking for more info for you I realize it may be specific to my
sight as the only ref on google is to (final) comment re "broken IAS" at
"Revision 1.23" here:
<http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/open1x/xsupplicant/src/eap_types/mschapv2/eapmschapv2.c>
from a colleague at my sight (Uni of Auckland).
Fingers crossed.
Regards,
Morgan.
Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:41:34AM -0400, Morgan Read wrote:
>
>
>>Thanks (from what I could tell xsupplicant didn't without the patch -
>>something about ms implementing a standard more stringently than
>>necessary or expected, but I don't realy know).
>
>
> Well, please let me know if you have any issues with wpa_supplicant and
> I can consider adding a workaround etc. for this. I would need to get
> full debug log from wpa_supplicant and description of the authentication
> server (program, version, etc.) with such a report.
>
--
Morgan Read
<mailto:mstuffATplDOTnet>
More information about the Hostap
mailing list