Steve Backshall - Nature's Microworlds - 2 Serengeti.mp4, b01l4906

[Tony Quinn]

On 09/04/2018 19:00, Steve Dodd wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:34 PM, MacFH - C E Macfarlane
> <c.e.macfarlane at macfh.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I can see that that might be so, but I don't think it alters the thrust
>> of my argument, does it?  Wouldn't 1080p25 still be better to watch than
>> 720p50?
> Brains are weird things, could easily depend on viewing device (as I
> think earlier linked article mentioned.) For some reason motion blur
> seems to be _more_ noticeable with higher res content (there's a
> technical name for the effect which escapes me), so it may well not be
> clear cut.
>
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/25/the_future_of_moving_images_the_eyes_have_it/