BBC Licensing Expose

[michael norman]

On 28/02/17 22:44, Tony Quinn wrote:
>
>
> On 28/02/2017 22:30, CJB wrote:
>> I wish I'd never brought the subject up. But what a nasrty hate filled
>> email I first received from that David person. CJB.
>>
> He does come across as a truly vile individuial, it has to be said; but
> it's often the case with the deeply "committed" left-leaning types ....
> You WILL bow down to their groupthink, and any dissent will be treated
> with the deepest contempt, and result in you being branded something-ist
> (whatever you're accused of being, you can rest assured that it's been
> so degraded by misuse, that it's a meaningless label), and they're too
> thick to realise that by being continually abusive to those with whom
> they disagree, they merely stiffen the resolve of the abusee(s), and
> then they are totally shocked by things such as the Brexit vote, and the
> election of Donald Trump. How dare the uneducated plebs disagree with
> them, with their 2.2 degrees in some poxy humanities discipline from the
> polyversity of the central black country (formerly walsall tech).
>
> I've just got in from working, and the revelation that Wikipedia won't
> accept information from certain sources because of lack of research,
> appears to be one of the biggest cases of pots calling kettles non-white
> that I've ever come across. Wikepedia, with its levels of inaccuracy, is
> one of the biggest jokes amongst the people that I mix with on a regular
> basis.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> get_iplayer mailing list
> get_iplayer at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer



You are the one parading a political view here, none of your rant has 
anything to do with the issue.  Which was simply that the Mail is anti 
BBC, is discredited as a reliable news source, especially about the BBC.