Command line to http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-23310447

[David Woodhouse]

On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 19:11 +0100, Ian Macdonald wrote:
> Gmail seems to be a problem, you need to 'reply all' otherwise it just
> goes to original poster

I'm not sure why you describe that as 'a problem'. What you said,
basically, is that with GMail you heed to use the 'reply all' option if
you want it to reply to all. Why would that be a problem?

As you have observed, if you use the 'reply to sender' option (perhaps
just labelled 'reply'), then it replies to the sender.

What *else* would you expect?

> On 21 Jul 2013, at 17:21, "Vangelis forthnet"
> <northmedia1 at the.forthnet.gr> wrote:
> 
> > (Posting to the list what Chris Chery [chrischery at free.fr] again
> sent directly to my inbox, rather than the list)

I think I see why you included this bit — it sets the stage for what you
said yourself. But you should have put it *first*, so that it could
actually do that. Not afterwards, when it's too late.

> > On Sat July 20 2013 18:31 EEST, Chris Chery wrote:
> > 
> >> ok thanks

I don't know why you included these lines. Please explain.

> > You are certainly most welcome...

I don't know why you included this line. Please explain.

> > 1. You did not grace us with any further details as to whether your
>  issue has indeed been resolved now, or which was the cause of your
>  continued failures...
> 
I don't know why you included these lines. Please explain.

> > That way more people would have benefitted if found in a similar
>  situation to yours...

I don't know why you included these lines. Please explain.

> > 2. It appears that all three of my points raised in my previous mail
> in this thread have fallen on deaf ears...

I don't know why you included these lines. Please explain.

> > So be it, then... Dum spiro, spero...

I don't know why you included this line. Please explain.

> > Vangelis 

I don't know why you included this line. Please explain.

> > _______________________________________________
> > get_iplayer mailing list
> > get_iplayer at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer

I am *particularly* confused about why you include these lines, since
they are added to the bottom of every mailing list post *anyway*. So why
would you think it necessary to have an extra copy? That's just odd.

Please take more care in trimming your citations in future, and be sure
to include *only* what is actually needed for context. The whole of the
previous posting is *in* the list archive for anyone who needs it;
there's no need to repeat it in its entirety. Please do not.

-- 
dwmw2

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5745 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/get_iplayer/attachments/20130721/c25cca47/attachment.bin>