Move the list to

James Laska jlaska at
Thu Jul 28 15:47:38 EDT 2011


I've not been involved much on the fedora-ppc list.  I've been looking
into extending to the Fedora release criteria [1] to allow secondary
architectures, like PPC, to provide a consistent goal-post for
determining release readiness.  

My topic for this mail though is whether it would be appropriate to move
this list to [2]?  There is certainly no rule
that says Fedora secondary architecture mailing lists must exist on, but I thought for consistency it might be good to move the
list there.  

Any thoughts/concerns/objections?  If not, I'll be happy to submit a
request to move things over.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the Fedora-ppc mailing list