Fedora-ppc Digest, Vol 69, Issue 1
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at gmail.com
Tue Jun 8 08:05:25 EDT 2010
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:47:33AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 13:39 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 08:17:23PM +0300, Robert Hagan wrote:
>> >As somewhat of a novice at both Fedora and powerpc, does anyone have
>> >news on when we may expect Fedora13 for powerpc to be available?
>>
>> There is no ETA for Fedora 13 ppc/ppc64.
>
>I took a quick look at this. I was _hoping_ that it would be a simple
>case of doing a compose... but there are actually quite a lot of build
>failures.
Yes, they have grown over the past couple of months. I tried reporting build
failures in bugzilla with limited success and I don't have time to fix them
all at the moment.
>Is there any tool to make sense of these and find the original failure
>from which the others cascade, and to resubmit the dependent failures?
No. Other than the output from koji-shadow, which isn't really accessible or
easy to read over.
>Is there a generic "Fedora secondary arches" mailing list where such
>things should be discussed?
secondary at lists.fedoraproject.org
>Let's pick the gcc-4.4.4-5.fc13 build failure as the first one to
>investigate.... it failed in deps due to not finding /usr/lib64/libc.so.
>
>Is this because the glibc64 package isn't tagged in
>SHADOWBUILD-dist-f13-build? Perhaps because Jakub never did a build of
>glibc64 for F-13? Can we remedy that?
This is because koji-shadow is dumb and didn't bring in the glibc64 package.
It will likely work if submitted by hand.
>Can we get the build repositories rsynced onto bombadil so that we can
>use mock manually there?
The repos for the tags? Not sure. My bandwidth is the limiting factor for
most of this and I'm hoping to get new hardware placed into the PXH2 datacenter
in not horribly long.
josh
More information about the Fedora-ppc
mailing list