iMX ddrphy_utils difference with U-boot
Ahmad Fatoum
a.fatoum at pengutronix.de
Thu Jun 11 13:36:32 PDT 2026
sorry for the noise. Sent a draft instead of discarding it :/
On 6/11/26 22:35, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Andrei,
>
> On 6/8/26 16:24, Andrei Lalaev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am moving an iMX8MP module from vendor U-Boot 2024.04 to Barebox 2025.02
>> and found a strange difference in the DDR training code:
>>
>> vim drivers/ddr/imx/ddrphy_utils.c +94
>>
>> And the corresponding line in U-Boot:
>>
>> vim drivers/ddr/imx/phy/ddrphy_utils.c +101
>>
>> Is there any chance that somebody knows/remembers why "return -1" was replaced with "hang()"?
>
>
>
>>
>> I couldn't find any explanation in the commits/mailing lists.
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Andrei Lalaev
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list