[PATCH 4/9] mci: add RPMB support
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Tue Mar 18 04:33:05 PDT 2025
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 04:18:32PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
>
> On 3/12/25 13:16, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > +
> > +int mci_rpmb_route_frames(struct mci *mci, void *req, unsigned long reqlen,
> > + void *rsp, unsigned long rsplen)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Whoever crafted the data supplied to this function knows how to
> > + * format the PRMB frames and which response is expected. If
> > + * there's some unexpected mismatch it's more helpful to report an
> > + * error immediately than trying to guess what was the intention
> > + * and possibly just delay an eventual error which will be harder
> > + * to track down.
> > + */
> > + void *rpmb_data = NULL;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mci_blk_part_switch(mci->rpmb_part);
> > +
> > + if (!IS_ALIGNED((uintptr_t)req, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN)) {
>
> Even if alignment happens to be correct, there is no guarantee that
> there is no other data sharing a cache line.
reqlen is expected to be a single block of 512 bytes, so indeed when req
is aligned then the end is cacheline aligned as well. We could check
reqlen as well, but I actually never ran into this case, so we can just
return an error for now as you suggested.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list