[PATCH 2/4] test: bthread: change comparison condition for switches vs. yields
Bastian Krause
bst at pengutronix.de
Tue Apr 1 01:53:29 PDT 2025
Hi Ahmad,
On 3/27/25 3:47 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> The code was written with the assumption that isolated yields from test
> thread to main thread and back will always be at least as fast as
> unrestricted scheduling.
>
> This assumption held so far, but breaks down in sandbox, because it's
> highly influenced by the system's CPU pressure.
>
> Just check that we can schedule @1000Hz at least in both cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
> ---
> test/py/test_bthread.py | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/py/test_bthread.py b/test/py/test_bthread.py
> index 6e7b4ba5007e..84fb9f830b0c 100644
> --- a/test/py/test_bthread.py
> +++ b/test/py/test_bthread.py
> @@ -20,4 +20,5 @@ def test_bthread(barebox, barebox_config):
> switches = int(barebox.run_check("bthread -c")[0].split()[0])
> yields = int(barebox.run_check("bthread -t")[0].split()[0])
>
> - assert yields < switches
> + assert yields > 1000
> + assert yields > 1000
I guess one of these asserts should involve "switches", right?
Regards,
Bastian
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list