[PATCH 18/19] mci: imx-esdhc-pbl: implement esdhc xload for ls1028a

[Sascha Hauer]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 06:36:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 03:17:45PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/mci/imx-esdhc-pbl.c b/drivers/mci/imx-esdhc-pbl.c
> > index c13830d726..2c74d101e4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mci/imx-esdhc-pbl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mci/imx-esdhc-pbl.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> >  #include <asm/sections.h>
> >  #include <asm/cache.h>
> >  #include <mach/imx/xload.h>
> > +#include <firmware.h>
> > +#include <asm/atf_common.h>
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_IMX
> >  #include <mach/imx/atf.h>
> >  #include <mach/imx/imx6-regs.h>
> > @@ -319,7 +321,8 @@ static int layerscape_esdhc_load_image(struct fsl_esdhc_host *host, void *adr, u
> >  	val |= div_val;
> >  	sdhci_write32(&host->sdhci, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL__TIMEOUT_CONTROL__SOFTWARE_RESET, val);
> >  
> > -	sdhci_write32(&host->sdhci, ESDHC_DMA_SYSCTL, ESDHC_SYSCTL_DMA_SNOOP);
> > +	sdhci_write32(&host->sdhci, ESDHC_DMA_SYSCTL,
> > +		      ESDHC_SYSCTL_DMA_SNOOP | ESDHC_SYSCTL_PERIPHERAL_CLK_SEL);
> 
> This affects ls1046, too. Is this intended?

It's not intended to do this in this patch, nevertheless I beliebe it's
the right thing to do also for LS1046a

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |