[PATCH 1/4] DNM: dts: arm64: rockchip: copy pf5 device tree from mainline Linux

[Sascha Hauer]

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 03:33:00PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 12.04.24 15:02, Michael Riesch wrote:
> > Hi Marco,
> > 
> > Thanks for your response!
> > 
> > On 4/5/24 19:02, Marco Felsch wrote:
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >> thanks for your patches.
> >>
> >>> DNM: dts: arm64: rockchip: copy pf5 device tree from
> >>
> >> I suppose DNM means "do not merge", instead of marking it this way we
> >> put the not yet upstream Linux dts files into arch as well but mark them
> >> as upstream dts file, e.g.:
> >>
> >>   - arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-innocomm-wb15-evk-upstream.dts
> >>   - arch/arm/dts/imx8mp-debix-model-a-upstream.dts
> >>   - arch/arm/dts/imx8mp-debix-som-a-bmb-08-upstream.dts
> >>   - arch/arm/dts/imx8mp-debix-som-a-upstream.dtsi
> 
> I have been wondering if we should add yet another device tree
> directory for kernel DTs that are not yet in the kernel, e.g.
> common/boards/dts. Then we can place full DTs there, remove them
> once they are in dts/ and clean up arch/$ARCH/dts/ that way.
> 
> > OK, I'll do it that way!
> > 
> >> Once the files are usptream we can remove them.
> > 
> > Is this something I should keep in mind or may I expect that this
> > happens automagically?
> 
> Usually, when someone notices. Having them in a single directory
> as suggested above may make it easier to sport no longer needed DTs.
> 
> Thoughts?

+1

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |