[PATCH] Documentation: dt-bindings: ocotp: deprecate barebox,provide-mac-address

[Marco Felsch]

On 23-09-11, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> While we'll continue to support barebox,provide-mac-address, new boards
> should prefer using the upstream NVMEM binding for describing the MAC address.
> 
> Add an example to the documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  .../bindings/misc/fsl,imx-ocotp.rst           | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/fsl,imx-ocotp.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/fsl,imx-ocotp.rst
> index 202bb3aa07ef..1c45267b1b58 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/fsl,imx-ocotp.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/fsl,imx-ocotp.rst
> @@ -6,13 +6,14 @@ Required properties:
>  * ``compatible``: ``fsl,imx6q-ocotp``
>  * ``reg``: physical register base and size
>  
> -Optional properties:
> +Deprecated properties:
>  
>  * ``barebox,provide-mac-address``: Provide MAC addresses for Ethernet devices. This
>    can be multiple entries in the form <&phandle regofs> to assign a MAC
> -  address to an Ethernet device.
> +  address to an Ethernet device. This has been deprecated in favor or the upstream
> +  nvmem cell binding.
>  
> -Example:
> +Legacy example:

Do we still need to list it as example? Seems a bit odd for deprecated
bindings.

Regards,
  Marco

>  .. code-block:: none
>  
> @@ -21,3 +22,21 @@ Example:
>    	reg = <0x021bc000 0x4000>;
>    	barebox,provide-mac-address = <&fec 0x620>;
>    };
> +
> +Upstream alternative:
> +
> +.. code-block:: none
> +
> +  &ocotp1 {
> +  	#address-cells = <1>;
> +  	#size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +  	fec_mac_addr: mac-addr at 88 {
> +  		reg = <0x88 6>;
> +  	};
> +  };
> +
> +  &fec {
> +  	nvmem-cells = <&fec_mac_addr>;
> +  	nvmem-cell-names = "mac-address";
> +  };
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 
>