ARM: aarch64: lowlevel: potential bug in arm_cpu_lowlevel_init
Ahmad Fatoum
a.fatoum at pengutronix.de
Thu Sep 7 01:26:33 PDT 2023
Hello Lior,
On 16.08.23 12:14, Lior Weintraub wrote:
> Thanks Sascha!
>
> Actually the bootloader is still under development so there is no problem to change and work without MMU.
> (or at lease disable it before jumping to Barebox).
> I totally agree that if virtual mapping was used it would be impossible to disable the MMU.
> Just thought that it is totally harmless to add `dsb sy`.
as Sascha mentioned, we expect MMU to be off, but some BootROMs fail to
do that in some error cases. I thus think if a barrier would save us
in such a case, we should have it in arm_cpu_lowlevel_init().
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> Cheers,
> Lior.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 1:02 PM
>> To: Lior Weintraub <liorw at pliops.com>
>> Cc: andrew.smirnov at gmail.com; barebox at lists.infradead.org; Ahmad
>> Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
>> Subject: Re: ARM: aarch64: lowlevel: potential bug in arm_cpu_lowlevel_init
>>
>> CAUTION: External Sender
>>
>> Hi Lior,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 11:35:05AM +0000, Lior Weintraub wrote:
>>> Link: [1]File-List
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> I am asking about a patch you've introduced about 4 years ago:
>>> Commit: cd6e1857a6a824d562bd27379d191602c074f6b7
>>>
>>> ENTRY(arm_cpu_lowlevel_init)
>>> switch_el x1, 3f, 2f, 1f
>>>
>>> 3:
>>> mov x0, #1 /*
>>> Non-Secure EL0/1 */
>>> orr x0, x0, #(1 << 10) /* 64-bit EL2
>>> */
>>> msr scr_el3, x0
>>> msr cptr_el3, xzr
>>>
>>> mrs x0, sctlr_el3
>>> ldr x1, =SCTLR_ELx_FLAGS
>>> bic x0, x0, x1
>>> msr sctlr_el3, x0
>>> isb
>>>
>>> b done
>>>
>>> This code has introduced a bug in our barebox porting.
>>> It could be our mistake but then again we couldn't find any prerequisites
>>> conditions that bootloaders need to meet before passing control to
>> barebox
>>> pbl.
>>> There are 2 bugs that can happen here:
>>> 1. The bootloader enabled MMU and set the SRAM (given to barebox) as
>>> non-secure – This issue can be resolved with adding "dsb sy" command
>>> before the "isb"
>>> 2. The bootloader enabled MMU and dcache on SRAM (given to barebox)
>> as
>>> non-secure – This is a bit harder to solve because it needs to call
>>> cache invalidate on the stack.
>>
>> Eventhough it might not be explicitly documented, barebox normally
>> expects to be called with MMU disabled.
>>
>> When the MMU is enabled it could have virtually any mapping and there's
>> no sane way to disable the MMU then.
>>
>> If your bootloader enables the MMU and there is no way to change that,
>> then it's up to your board entry code to disable the MMU before calling into
>> barebox. That said, when there's something can change in
>> arm_cpu_lowlevel_init()
>> to help you with your case, then we can do that, but I wouldn't consider
>> this a bug in barebox.
>>
>> Sascha
>>
>> --
>> Pengutronix e.K. | |
>> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://secure-
>> web.cisco.com/17RdScP_TBoXqc1IerwhZX8kAHhqutjAnByPiUM5lNZJyN6OD
>> jkdTnyYCzrqpRZ9mdLg4wp-dZiElAak3iS7lf-YQwNFSattw-4zxIt6ro_qHh-
>> 8ovK33TBdMnr5qL5qPKFUriYYQ8bLMAnMHa4bKtTIfhZI2eSXUr6hqjDcnoKZ
>> GKUO2dbBDXceX3NT-ql9GBlwdH-mmkhd9fgYV2r0UtR4ot5d58hg45JTJ-
>> LsuvNVMsKrFZd1Iu3AiMSjmi4E5BDc6KpQx_MgAD410FQWC0HpDavhSc1DC
>> BgdMO2RlGrZk0L-
>> St3n_yH_QZvH4UfjY/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pengutronix.de%2F |
>> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
>> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list