[PATCH 2/5] dmesg: error out on unknown loglevels
Marco Felsch
m.felsch at pengutronix.de
Mon Jun 12 23:57:18 PDT 2023
On 23-06-13, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 08:34:39AM +0200, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Hi Sascha,
> >
> > On 23-06-12, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > The user deserves an error when an unknown loglevel is given, so
> > > print an error instead of silently ignoring unknown loglevels.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > commands/dmesg.c | 6 +++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/commands/dmesg.c b/commands/dmesg.c
> > > index 339910bb76..2a36710b98 100644
> > > --- a/commands/dmesg.c
> > > +++ b/commands/dmesg.c
> > > @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ static int str_to_loglevel(const char *str)
> > > if (!strcmp(str, "emerg"))
> > > return MSG_EMERG;
> > >
> > > + printf("dmesg: unknown loglevel %s\n", str);
> > > +
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -51,6 +53,8 @@ static unsigned dmesg_get_levels(const char *__args)
> > > level = str_to_loglevel(str);
> > > if (level >= 0)
> > > flags |= BIT(level);
> > > + else
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > This is more explicit but wouldn't be required since we initialized
> > 'flags = 0'.
>
> It is required as flags might be != 0 already and we want to return 0
> in error case. Nevertheless this needs fixing as this return looses
> memory allocated with xstrdup above.
Argh.. right I overlooked the while(1).
> > > }
> > >
> > > free(args);
> > > @@ -81,7 +85,7 @@ static int do_dmesg(int argc, char *argv[])
> > > case 'l':
> > > levels = dmesg_get_levels(optarg);
> > > if (!levels)
> > > - return COMMAND_ERROR_USAGE;
> > > + return COMMAND_ERROR;
> >
> > Out of curiosity what's the difference between COMMAND_ERROR and
> > COMMAND_ERROR_USAGE?
>
> When a command returns with COMMAND_ERROR_USAGE then the usage
> for the command is printed. COMMAND_ERROR just returns an error
> without printing the commands usage.
>
> When a command prints a meaningful error message then I often
> find it confusing when the usage is printed, because the error
> is often buried in the long help text.
Thanks for the clarification, make sense.
> ---------------------------8<------------------------------
>
> From adadd6c0fcfd6b11076e0110497dd7ecdb44f99c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:12:11 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] dmesg: error out on unknown loglevels
>
> The user deserves an error when an unknown loglevel is given, so
> print an error instead of silently ignoring unknown loglevels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch at pengutronix.de>
> ---
> commands/dmesg.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/commands/dmesg.c b/commands/dmesg.c
> index 339910bb76..0d46353fb5 100644
> --- a/commands/dmesg.c
> +++ b/commands/dmesg.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ static int str_to_loglevel(const char *str)
> if (!strcmp(str, "emerg"))
> return MSG_EMERG;
>
> + printf("dmesg: unknown loglevel %s\n", str);
> +
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -49,8 +51,12 @@ static unsigned dmesg_get_levels(const char *__args)
> break;
>
> level = str_to_loglevel(str);
> - if (level >= 0)
> - flags |= BIT(level);
> + if (level < 0) {
> + flags = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + flags |= BIT(level);
> }
>
> free(args);
> @@ -81,7 +87,7 @@ static int do_dmesg(int argc, char *argv[])
> case 'l':
> levels = dmesg_get_levels(optarg);
> if (!levels)
> - return COMMAND_ERROR_USAGE;
> + return COMMAND_ERROR;
> break;
> case 'r':
> flags |= BAREBOX_LOG_PRINT_RAW | BAREBOX_LOG_PRINT_TIME;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
More information about the barebox
mailing list