[PATCH 10/10] gpiolib: add of_xlate support
Marco Felsch
m.felsch at pengutronix.de
Mon Jun 5 02:51:12 PDT 2023
Hi Jules,
On 23-06-05, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> I tried this patch series on my sunxi branch and it applies nicely
> but failed to get the gpio with the following message:
> of_get_named_gpio_flags: unable to get gpio num of device 1c20800.pinctrl at 1c20800.of: -22
>
> The error -22 is for -EINVAL which comes form of_xlate_and_get_gpiod_flags
> because the test `chip->of_gpio_n_cells != gpiospec->args_count` fails,
> `of_gpio_n_cells` hasn't been set by the driver and it value was 0.
>
> I wonder if `of_gpio_n_cells` should be set by the driver or by parsing the
> #gpio-cells property from device-tree?
The driver need to define the cells since the driver is the one
interpreting the cells, please have a look on:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c#L1583
> By setting the expected value in the driver resolves this "issue".
Cool :) so you are able to controll the sunxi-gpios? :)
Thanks a lot for testing. I will send a v2 with your found spelling
issues.
Regards,
Marco
> Cheers,
> -- Jules
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/of_gpio.c b/drivers/of/of_gpio.c
> > +static int of_xlate_and_get_gpiod_flags(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> > + struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec,
> > + enum of_gpio_flags *flags)
> > +{
> > + if (chip->of_gpio_n_cells != gpiospec->args_count)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> error message caused by this ^
>
> > +
> > + return chip->ops->of_xlate(chip, gpiospec, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * of_get_named_gpio_flags() - Get a GPIO number and flags to use with GPIO API
> > * @np: device node to get GPIO from
> > @@ -61,7 +99,7 @@ int of_get_named_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np, const char *propname,
> > int index, enum of_gpio_flags *flags)
> > {
> > struct of_phandle_args gpiospec;
> > - struct device *dev;
> > + struct gpio_chip *chip;
> > int ret;
> >
> > ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, propname, "#gpio-cells",
> > @@ -72,27 +110,21 @@ int of_get_named_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np, const char *propname,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - dev = of_find_device_by_node(gpiospec.np);
> > - if (!dev) {
> > - pr_debug("%s: unable to find device of node %s\n",
> > - __func__, gpiospec.np->full_name);
> > + chip = of_find_gpiochip_by_xlate(&gpiospec);
> > + if (!chip) {
> > ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = gpio_get_num(dev, gpiospec.args[0]);
> > - if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > - goto out;
> > + ret = of_xlate_and_get_gpiod_flags(chip, &gpiospec, flags);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > pr_err("%s: unable to get gpio num of device %s: %d\n",
> got this error message here
>
> > - __func__, dev_name(dev), ret);
> > + __func__, dev_name(chip->dev), ret);
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - if (flags) {
> > - *flags = gpiospec.args[1];
> > + if (flags)
> > of_gpio_flags_quirks(np, propname, flags, index);
> > - }
> >
> > out:
> > of_node_put(gpiospec.np);
>
More information about the barebox
mailing list