[PATCH 5/8] ARM64: asm: rewrite ENTRY_FUNCTION(_WITHSTACK) fully in assembly
Sascha Hauer
sha at pengutronix.de
Mon Oct 24 01:55:19 PDT 2022
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 08:57:13AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Recent episode with pointer authentication showed again that for
> platforms without __attribute__((naked)), we are better off writing
> the early header in assembly. We still want to keep the board specific
> entry points in C for ease of use, so we have ENTRY_FUNCTION_WITHSTACK
> generate two symbols:
>
> - A 32-bit stack top value that's placed in .rodata
>
> - An entry point with the normal C code, including stack-using
> prologues
>
> The new common assembly head code will access the stack pointer in a
> position-independent manner and set it up, before continuing with the
> C code. The barebox header is part of the common assembly head code
> ensuring it's not moved around due to compiler code generation.
>
> The common code will need access to board-specific entry point and stack
> top. The former is readily available as the alias __pbl_board_entry.
> The latter is a bit more complicated, as the symbol may not exist for
> boards not using the common header in a multi-image build.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Makefile | 3 +--
> arch/arm/cpu/Makefile | 2 ++
> arch/arm/cpu/head_64.S | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h | 28 +++++++----------------
> arch/arm/lib/pbl.lds.S | 9 ++++++++
> 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/head_64.S
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 81ef44122367..a4b9f3c021d7 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -660,8 +660,7 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fno-stack-check)
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fcf-protection=none)
>
> # We don't have the necessary infrastructure to benefit from ARMv8.3+ pointer
> -# authentication. On older CPUs, they are interpreted as NOPs and blot the
> -# code and break less portable code that expects a very specific code layout
> +# authentication. On older CPUs, they are interpreted as NOPs bloating the code
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mbranch-protection=none)
>
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, address-of-packed-member)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/Makefile
> index c0993c1abe5d..7674c1464c1f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ AFLAGS_hyp.pbl.o :=-Wa,-march=armv7-a -Wa,-mcpu=all
> obj-y += start.o entry.o entry_ll$(S64).o
> KASAN_SANITIZE_start.o := n
>
> +pbl-$(CONFIG_CPU_64) += head_64.o
> +
> pbl-$(CONFIG_BOARD_ARM_GENERIC_DT) += board-dt-2nd.o
> pbl-$(CONFIG_BOARD_ARM_GENERIC_DT_AARCH64) += board-dt-2nd-aarch64.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/head_64.S b/arch/arm/cpu/head_64.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4ed4ffb05250
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/head_64.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +#include <linux/linkage.h>
> +#include <asm/barebox-arm64.h>
> +#include <asm/image.h>
> +
> +/* Linker will point these at board-specific symbols */
> +.globl __pbl_board_stack_top
> +.globl __pbl_board_entry
> +
> +.section .text_head_prologue_common, "x"
> +ENTRY(__barebox_arm64_head)
> + nop
> + nop
> + nop
Why these nops here?
> + adr x9, __pbl_board_stack_top
> + ldr w9, [x9]
> + cbz x9, 1f
> + mov sp, x9
> + b 1f
> + .org 0x20
> + .asciz "barebox"
> + .word 0xffffffff
> + .word _barebox_image_size /* image size to copy */
> + .rept 8
> + .word 0x55555555
> + .endr
> +1:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PBL_BREAK
> + brk #17
> + nop
> +#else
> + nop
> + nop
> +#endif
Why do you jump over the barebox header? You could put all the code
before it.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list