[PATCH] env: let setenv() take printf arguments

Sascha Hauer sha at pengutronix.de
Mon Jun 20 01:16:23 PDT 2022


On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 09:59:00AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
> 
> On 20.06.22 09:47, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 09:21:39AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> >>
> >> It's a common pattern to (ba)sprintf to a string and then call setenv()
> >> with this string. Let setenv() take printf arguments to make that
> >> easier. To avoid the overhead that goes with changing other callers
> >> to using setenv(var, "%s", val) to avoid security implications (and
> >> GCC warnings), fallback to the non-formatted version when there are
> >> only two arguments.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> >> [afa: fall back to non-formatted version on old two arg version]
> >> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum at pengutronix.de>
> >> ---
> >> Thoughts?
> > 
> > While I'm impressed by this macro I don't like this very much. My desire
> > was to simplify things, now with this patch I'm no longer sure I reached
> > that goal.
> 
> Usage _is_ simpler. Declaration indeed looks a bit odd, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> 
> > 
> > Alternatively we could
> > 
> > a) Drop the original patch
> > b) Replace the problematic places with setenv(foo, "%s", not_a_string_literal);
> > c) Pass -Wno-format-security, The Kernel does this for over a decade.
> 
> Then it probably needs to be revisited there then.
> 
> > My vote is c)
> 
> I am not fine with c). We don't sanitize for % in environment variable values
> and ignoring the warning has very clear security implications.

Ok, good point.

Then there's of course

d) keep setenv like it was before and introduce
   pr_setenv(const char *_name, const char *fmt, ...)

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



More information about the barebox mailing list