[PATCH v3 3/7] ARM: boards: skov-imx6: add switch detection
Sascha Hauer
sha at pengutronix.de
Fri Oct 1 07:29:11 PDT 2021
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:15:24PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> There are board variants with same board ID but not switch. Detect this
> variants.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel at pengutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/boards/skov-imx6/board.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/skov-imx6/board.c b/arch/arm/boards/skov-imx6/board.c
> index 030ac62c52..a94c2cd25c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boards/skov-imx6/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/boards/skov-imx6/board.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <net.h>
> #include <of_gpio.h>
> #include <gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/micrel_phy.h>
>
> #include "version.h"
>
> @@ -130,6 +131,9 @@ copy_mac_from_eth0:
> return eth_of_fixup_node_from_eth_device(root, node_path, ethname);
> }
>
> +#define SKOV_GPIO_MDIO_BUS 0
> +#define SKOV_LAN1_PHY_ADDR 1
> +
> #define MAX_V_GPIO 8
>
> struct board_description {
> @@ -303,20 +307,121 @@ static const struct board_description imx6_variants[] = {
> };
>
> static int skov_board_no = -1;
> +static bool skov_no_switch = false;
I think a skov_have_switch variable would be more intuitive.
> +static const char *no_switch_suffix = "-noswitch";
>
> -static int skov_imx6_fixup(struct device_node *root, void *unused)
> +static void fixup_machine_compatible(const char *compat,
> + struct device_node *root)
> {
> + int cclen = 0, clen = strlen(compat) + 1;
> + const char *curcompat;
> + void *buf;
> +
> + if (!root) {
> + root = of_get_root_node();
> + if (!root)
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + curcompat = of_get_property(root, "compatible", &cclen);
> +
> + buf = xzalloc(cclen + clen);
> +
> + memcpy(buf, compat, clen);
> + memcpy(buf + clen, curcompat, cclen);
> +
> + /*
> + * Prepend the compatible from board entry to the machine compatible.
> + * Used to match bootspec entries against it.
> + */
> + of_set_property(root, "compatible", buf, cclen + clen, true);
> +
> + free(buf);
> +}
> +
> +static void fixup_noswitch_machine_compatible(struct device_node *root)
> +{
> + const char *compat = imx6_variants[skov_board_no].dts_compatible;
> + const char *generic = "skov,imx6";
> + size_t size, size_generic;
> + char *buf;
> int ret;
> - const char *val;
> - uint32_t brightness;
> +
> + size = strlen(compat) + strlen(no_switch_suffix) + 1;
> + size_generic = strlen(generic) + strlen(no_switch_suffix) + 1;
> + size = max(size, size_generic);
> + buf = xzalloc(size);
> + if (!buf) {
> + pr_warn("Can't allocate buffer\n");
> + return;
> + }
No need to check xzallox return value.
> +
> + /* add generic compatible, so systemd&co can make right decisions */
> + ret = snprintf(buf, size, "%s%s", generic, no_switch_suffix);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + fixup_machine_compatible(buf, root);
> + else
> + pr_warn("Can't prepare generic compatible string\n");
> +
> + /* add specific compatible as fallback, in case this board has new
> + * challenges.
> + */
> + ret = snprintf(buf, size, "%s%s", compat, no_switch_suffix);
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + fixup_machine_compatible(buf, root);
> + else
> + pr_warn("Can't prepare specific compatible string\n");
> +
> + free(buf);
Looks like this code could be more straight forward using two xasprintf
calls.
> +}
> +
> +static void skov_imx6_no_switch(struct device_node *root)
> +{
> struct device_node *node;
> - struct device_node *chosen = of_create_node(root, "/chosen");
> + int ret;
> +
> + fixup_noswitch_machine_compatible(root);
>
> + node = of_find_node_by_path_from(root, "/soc/bus at 2100000/ethernet at 2188000");
> + if (!node) {
> + pr_warn("Did not find node to disable it\n");
> + } else {
Please use positive logic like you did below.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the barebox
mailing list